Search for: "U. S. v. Bruce*" Results 61 - 80 of 154
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2018, 4:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Andrew’s affidavit was sufficient to raise a question of fact as to whether the defendant engaged in a course of continuous representation intended to rectify or mitigate the initial act of alleged malpractice (see Melnick v Farrell, 128 AD3d 1371, 1372 [2015]; DeStaso v Condon Resnick, LLP, 90 AD3d 809, 812-813 [2011]; Gravel v Cicola, 297 AD2d 620, 621 [2002]). [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 3:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 Leschinski v Bailey;  2012 NY Slip Op 30202(U);  January 11, 2012 Supreme Court, Nassau County; Docket Number: 1934/10; Judge: R. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:59 pm by John Ehrett
§ 2255, which requires an evidentiary hearing “[u]nless the motion and the files and records of the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief. [read post]