Search for: "U. S. v. Chiodo" Results 1 - 1 of 1
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2023, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Moreover, “[ m ]isconduct that occurs before an attorney’s discharge but is not discovered until after the discharge may serve as a basis for a fee forfeiture” ( Orendick v Chiodo,272 AD2d 901, 902 [ 4th Dept 2000]). [read post]