Search for: "U. S. v. Connor"
Results 61 - 80
of 199
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2010, 5:41 pm
Independence Tube Corp., 467 U. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 4:22 am
He made it clear in his Stenberg dissent that he felt that O'Connor and Souter stabbed him in the back and misapplied Casey's undue burden standard. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 3:10 am
Allegations Allegations of overbilling, padding of costs, and billing for unnecessary legal services can constitute a cause of action for breach of contract, provided the allegations do not directly challenge the quality of the attorney’s work (Ullmann-Schneider v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, P.C., 121 AD3d 415,416 [1st Dept 2014]; O’Connor v Blodnick, Abramowitz and Blodnick, 295 AD2d 586,587 [2d Dept 2002] [same]). [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm
Justice O’CONNOR delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 This case requires us to consider to what extent the “fair use” provision of the Copyright Revision Act of 1976, (hereinafter the Copyright Act) 17 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 7:07 am
From the majority opinion in the new case, Students for Fair Admission v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 9:53 am
See also Kolstad v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 4:05 am
Morgan, 536 U. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 7:08 am
Read an analysis of the merit decision in Ohio v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 7:07 am
See 26 U. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:24 am
Smith v. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 8:40 am
Justice Thomas' brief, seven-page majority's opinion just reinforces the strict definition of the "clearly established" requirement that has been around since Justice O'Connor's opinion in Williams v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 1:45 pm
Joan Biskupic also seems to have misread the import of Justice O'Connor's memo in Bush v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:00 am
Texas, 509 U. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
In the case of Bixler v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 1:26 pm
The Court in May agreed to decide, at its next Term, the case of Town of Greece v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 9:04 am
In O’Connor v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 3:59 pm
S. 793, 810-814 (2000) (plurality opinion); id., at 841-844 (O'Connor, J., concurring in judgment); Agostini, supra, at 225-227; Rosenberger v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 2:00 pm
S. 557, 567 (2001) (quoting State Oil Co. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 11:43 am
"Because the search was motivated by a legitimate work related purpose, and because it was not excessive in scope, the search was reasonable under the approach of the O’Connor plurality. 480 U. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 2:03 pm
(See Pate v. [read post]
