Search for: "U. S. v. Delay" Results 81 - 100 of 724
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2022, 9:57 am by Eric Goldman
  But most courts have sensibly concluded that automatic referrals would lead to unjustified delays and would overwhelm the resources of the Copyright Office. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 6:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
., LLC v Cullinan 2023 NY Slip Op 33478(U) October 5, 2023Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 159627/2022Judge: Lori S. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 6:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Kasmin v Josephs 2023 NY Slip Op 32468(U) July 19, 2023 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 152213/2020 Judge: Nancy M. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 4:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Thus, the delay was not attributable to insurance carrier delay, but rather, resulted from Billiard’s attempts and negotiations to alter the outcome of its insurance carrier’s disclaimer. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 4:18 am
App. 2001) ("[U]nder the facts of this case, society is not prepared to recognize as reasonable an individual's expectation of privacy in a blood sample lawfully obtained by police. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 10:00 am by Jordan Brunner
Addressing Kaspersky’s argument that its injury stems from its inability to sell its products to the U. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 3:00 am by Robert Kreisman
District Court judge in Chicago has denied employer Marsh USA’s summary judgment motion on Count V on Juanda Lynn Jordan’s Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) complaint. [read post]
If the court were to vacate the agency approvals, the United States’s first major offshore wind project could suffer serious delays. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 11:24 am by Margaret Wood
 This was unusual in itself since Article V of the U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 4:47 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
LIC, LLC v Ohana  2019 NY Slip Op 33294(U) September 25, 2019 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 706833/2016 Judge: Marguerite A. [read post]
27 May 2011, 5:17 am
And applying this Court’s usual bar on review would undermine the purpose of the two-step process, “which is to clarify constitutional rights without undue delay. [read post]