Search for: "U. S. v. Farrell" Results 1 - 20 of 80
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2015, 4:49 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Vizcarrondo, 2003 NY Slip Op. 50600(U) (Crim Ct, Kings County 2003); People v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 10:41 am by Dan Ernst
While there, listen to Wallace’s recording and view a 1979 U-matic videocassette entitled Langdell Legends, featuring numerous HLS professors, and Erwin Griswold]. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
In the whimsically captioned Cupcake & Boomboom, LLC v Aslani, 2016 NY Slip Op 32310(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Nov. 22, 2016], the outcome was anything but whimsical for the defendant. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 3:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Corp. v Farrell Fritz, P.C., 17 Misc 3d 132[A], 2007 NY Slip Op 51999[U] [App Term, 2d & 11th Jud Dists 2007]). [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 6:21 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Buxton v Zukoff  2020 NY Slip Op 33426(U) October 16, 2020  Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 160223/15 Judge: Lynn R. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 3:05 pm
"We have considered MPEP(v) and note that all address the issue of enablement of a written description under 35 USC, first paragraph. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 7:08 am
"We have considered MPEP(v) and note that all address the issue of enablement of a written description under 35 USC, first paragraph. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 4:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Andrew’s affidavit was sufficient to raise a question of fact as to whether the defendant engaged in a course of continuous representation intended to rectify or mitigate the initial act of alleged malpractice (see Melnick v Farrell, 128 AD3d 1371, 1372 [2015]; DeStaso v Condon Resnick, LLP, 90 AD3d 809, 812-813 [2011]; Gravel v Cicola, 297 AD2d 620, 621 [2002]). [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 3:22 am by Peter Mahler
Dufficy in Shih v Kim, 2017 NY Slip Op 50281(U) [Sup Ct Queens County Mar. 2, 2017]. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  LLC Member's Claims Against Managing Member Seek to Vindicate Individual Rights, Therefore Need Not Satisfy Derivative Claim Pleading Requirements Piroozian v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  LLC Member's Claims Against Managing Member Seek to Vindicate Individual Rights, Therefore Need Not Satisfy Derivative Claim Pleading Requirements Piroozian v. [read post]