Search for: "U. S. v. Gray"
Results 21 - 40
of 115
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
In other words, legally made works can be bought and sold and resold on the “grey” (or “gray” for those not in the Commonwealth) market, according to common sense. [read post]
28 May 2019, 11:42 am
Supreme Court held in Star Athletica, LLC v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:01 am
But as Rutgers Professor of Law and Sidney Reitman Scholar James Gray Pope wrote persuasively in “Snubbed Landmark: Why United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 10:22 am
Co. v Mendez, 2021 NY Slip Op 30071[U], *4, 2021 NY Misc LEXIS 85, *6-7 [Sup Ct, N.Y. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:57 am
In Advisers, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 12:01 pm
Accordingly, “[u]nder compulsion of Gray, we reverse defendant’s penalty phase verdict. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 12:01 pm
Accordingly, “[u]nder compulsion of Gray, we reverse defendant’s penalty phase verdict. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
When a Member State's law grants a monopoly of exploitation to the owner of such a right, it follows that the owner may forbid any unauthorized third party, or infringer, from any sale, use or other exploitation within that State.[40] If an industrial or commercial property right has considerable economic significance, the owner in one State usually seeks to obtain parallel protection in all of the other States of the Community; however, this is not always possible, either because… [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 6:39 am
Finally, in Gray v. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 10:30 pm
Gray, 642 F. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 9:33 am
Kelly, and will feature John Yoo, Professor of Law, Berkeley Law, U. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 12:13 pm
Recently, a federal court sitting in the Second Circuit’s Southern District of New York adopted the cat’s paw theory in a sexual harassment case entitled Vasquez v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 12:13 pm
Recently, a federal court sitting in the Second Circuit’s Southern District of New York adopted the cat’s paw theory in a sexual harassment case entitled Vasquez v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:23 pm
Gray, 2 Atk. 286, 26 Eng. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
Dismissed employee precluded from litigating her termination because of her failure to exhaust her administrative remediesMatter of Yan Ping Xu v New York City Dept. of Health, 2009 NY Slip Op 50147(U), Decided on January 23, 2009, Supreme Court, New York County [Not officially published]Yan Ping Xu, a New York City Research Scientist Level I, a position in the non-competitive class, was terminated from her position. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 1:05 am
In terms of HRA 1998, which came into force in 2000 after the decision in Gray v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 6:11 pm
Here is the abstract: In this brief essay, I try to draw some connections between the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Graham v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 7:26 am
Upholding the venue selection clause in Instagram’s TOS. * Chilutti v. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 9:13 am
" Lowery v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 10:27 pm
S., at ___ (slip op., at 14) (emphasis added); see also Holt v. [read post]
