Search for: "U. S. v. Horton" Results 21 - 35 of 35
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2012, 6:27 am by Adam Zimmerman
” This is because of the Supreme Court’s April 2011 decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 The California Supreme Court swiftly followed suit in Strauss v Horton, upholding the passage of Proposition 8, but applying that referendum prospectively, thereby preserving the approximately 18,000 marriages that had been performed prior to the passage of the referendum; and perhaps unwittingly creating an arbitrary class of persons to which other gays can point in an equal protection analysis. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 The California Supreme Court swiftly followed suit in Strauss v Horton, upholding the passage of Proposition 8, but applying that referendum prospectively, thereby preserving the approximately 18,000 marriages that had been performed prior to the passage of the referendum; and perhaps unwittingly creating an arbitrary class of persons to which other gays can point in an equal protection analysis. [read post]
28 May 2009, 7:07 am
That's the rule laid down by two 101-year-old companion cases, Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908) and General Oil Co. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 12:44 pm
Rev. 480 (1990), has been cited for the proposition that the brief that Dawn Johnsen wrote in Webster v. [read post]