Search for: "U. S. v. Howell" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2009, 2:52 pm by dbader1
Here’s a case that plaintiff’s personal injury lawyers have been hoping for:  Howell v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 7:01 am
The California Supreme Court recently reached a decision which many San Diego personal injury lawyers will likely find misguided in its ruling in Howell v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:15 am
The state's legal community and insurance industry will be watching closely on Tuesday, May 24, 2011, when the California Supreme Court reviews Rebecca Howell v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 8:51 am by Eugene Volokh
"[U]nless the parent or guardian is granted anonymity, the child's identity would effectively be revealed in the court filing through a combination of the name of the parent or guardian and the child's initials. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 4:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Cedeno v Pacelli 2019 NY Slip Op 32631(U) September 4, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 452016/2018 Judge: Margaret A. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 3:21 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  InBlumencranz v Botter  2012 NY Slip Op 32089(U) July 27, 2012  Sup Ct, Nassau County  Docket Number: 15489/11  Judge: Joel K. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 3:00 pm by George Ticoras, Esq.
Howell of the United States District Court for The District of Columbia issued an order, in CREW v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 10:01 am by Anna Salvatore
This opinion is the latest legal win for transgender rights, following the Supreme Court’s June ruling in Bostock v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:19 am by John Elwood
Merrill, 15-1139, and Howell v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 6:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  As happens in cases between siblings, Savitt v Krinsky 2020 NY Slip Op 31590(U) May 27, 2020 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 154052/2019  Judge: W. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 2:06 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Howell, 133 So. 3d at 521-23 (rejecting Howell's attempt to satisfy the burden of proof regarding the constitutionality of midazolam by demonstrating weaknesses of the State's testimony). [read post]