Search for: "U. S. v. Klein" Results 1 - 20 of 77
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2019, 4:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Although really only a procedural decision,Matz v Sol Klein P.A., Inc. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 8:31 am by Yishai Schwartz
Wednesday’s Supreme Court ruling in Bank Markazi v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 3:01 am
Employee found guilty of disciplinary charges involving absence from work based on records generated by global positioning equipmentMatter of Halpin v Klein, 62 AD3d 403*Joel I. [read post]
7 May 2009, 4:15 am
Employee found guilty of disciplinary charges involving absence from work based on records generated by global positioning equipmentMatter of Halpin v Klein, 2009 NY Slip Op 03593, Decided on May 5, 2009, Appellate Division, First Department*Joel I. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 8:48 am by Marcel Pemsel
and Calvin Klein perfumes in the discount retail stores of ALDI SÜD. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 5:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Cohen Tauber Spievack & Wagner P.C. v Mehulol  Publs., LLC 2022 NY Slip Op 30401(U) February 1, 2022 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 652426/2021 Judge Bluth determined the merits of a case alleging that the attorneys failed in both the Supreme Court case as well as in a Rabbinical court and never obtained “forgiveness” for the client. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 3:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Rodriguez v Dean    2018 NY Slip Op 30642(U)  April 10, 2018  Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 805280/16  Judge: Sherry Klein Heitler presents a new wrinkle we have not seen before. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 4:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Aside from the normal, every-day problem of attorney fees in litigation and how they tend to stack up, in Quadracci v Klein  2019 NY Slip Op 33837(U) December 24, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 650913/2016 Judge: Nancy M. [read post]
2 May 2018, 4:27 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Castlewood Apparel Corp. v Davidoff Hutcher & Citron LLP  2018 NY Slip Op 30717(U) April 23, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County  Docket Number: 150167/2017  Judge: Shlomo S. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 6:47 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Sky, LLC, 2017 NY Slip Op 30898[U], at *5 [Sup Ct, NY County 2017]; W. 189, LLC v Louis-Jeune, 2016 NY Slip Op 31614[U], at *1 [Sup Ct, NY County 2016].) [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 4:39 am
in Williams v Omrani & Taub, P.C. ;2009 NY Slip Op 51832(U) ;Decided on August 25, 2009 ;Supreme Court, Kings County ;Rivera, J. rendered a tri-partate decision, reviewing a dismissal motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1)  (a)(5) and  (a)(7). [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
In another post at E&E News, Gilmer notes that the first case on the new term’s docket, Weyerhaeuser Company v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:09 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Siracusa v Sager   2011 NY Slip Op 32244(U);August 3, 2011;Supreme Court, Suffolk County; Docket Number: 06-35942; gives Judge: Peter Fox Cohalan the opportunity to review a many faceted matrimonial child support legal malpractice case. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 5:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Klein, 88 N.Y.2d 1008, 1009–1010, 648 N.Y.S.2d 871, 671 N.E.2d 1268; Lamanna v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 12:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
The Petitioners:(1) Challenged as arbitrary and capricious the July 15, 2020, DOE's remote teaching policy for the 2020-2021 school year issued in response to the Covid-19 pandemic; and(2) Sought a court order compelling DOE to allow Petitioners “and all others similarly situated" to telework remotely on full salary or without loss of leave.Essentially Petitioners’ motion sought a temporary restraining order [TRO] prohibiting DOE from forcing Petitioners to report to… [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 12:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
The Petitioners:(1) Challenged as arbitrary and capricious the July 15, 2020, DOE's remote teaching policy for the 2020-2021 school year issued in response to the Covid-19 pandemic; and(2) Sought a court order compelling DOE to allow Petitioners “and all others similarly situated" to telework remotely on full salary or without loss of leave.Essentially Petitioners’ motion sought a temporary restraining order [TRO] prohibiting DOE from forcing Petitioners to report to… [read post]