Search for: "U. S. v. Leake" Results 41 - 60 of 141
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2011, 9:57 am by Steve Bainbridge
As for the case at bar, Macey argues that: Some of the government's accusations in U.S. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 8:20 pm by Dennis Crouch
S. 633 (2010) (quoting, for its current relevance, statement in United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 9:35 am
The Court heard argument on Monday in United States v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 2:41 pm by James R. Copland
Indeed, before her last year's service as Solicitor General, her most prominent litigation effort was probably having signed onto a wrongheaded amicus brief in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 Also destined for certiorari is Gill v Office of Personnel Management. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 Plaintiffs are represented by the unlikely but outstanding duo of Ted Olson and David Boies of Bush v Gore fame. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 3:28 am
According to Philips, Nintendo’s Wii and Wii U consoles infringed three of its patents relating to the interaction between users’ physical bodies and the virtual tennis character that one of Nintendo’s video games allows you to become. [read post]
4 Mar 2017, 4:34 pm by Chuck Cosson
Toward Consistent Principles Consistency of principle is often overlooked when stolen private information proves to be useful for political interests, and thus rationalizations ensue.[6]  Leaks that embarrass political opponents are justified as “getting out the truth that people need to know,” whereas leaks that embarrass one’s own political interests are "politically motivated. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 2:16 pm by Jeff Gamso
S. 123, 168 (1951) (Frankfurter, J., concurring), quoted in Goldberg v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 12:30 am by Monique Altheim
– Pueblo http://t.co/mknh0Izv # SC: 34,000 exposed in U. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Privacy, Remedies and Comity: The Emerging Problem of Global Injunctions and Some Preliminary Thoughts On How Best to Address It, Part V, Chapter 19 in Comparative Privacy and Defamation 307-328 (András Koltay & Paul Wragg eds, Edward Elgar Publishing 2020), U of Alabama Legal Studies Research Paper No. 3723948, Ronald J. [read post]