Search for: "U. S. v. Leon" Results 41 - 60 of 104
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2018, 4:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Jonns v Fischbarg  2018 NY Slip Op 32353(U)  September 18, 2018  Supreme Court, New York  County  Docket Number: 150729/2017 Judge: Kathryn E. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 4:21 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Bluth is the rare case in which the solemn statements of Leon v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 4:38 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 Co. of New York, 98 NY 314, 326 [2002]; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 88 1994]). [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 11:55 am by Paul J. Feldman
” Judge Leon then laid out the government’s theory of market harm from a merger: that when Time Warner negotiates with rivals of AT&T’s MVPDs (DirecTV, DirecTVNow and AT&T U-Verse), it would have anti-competitive leverage over the rivals allowing it to either charge supra-competitive rates or to withhold the programming from the rivals entirely. [read post]
1 May 2017, 3:22 am by Peter Mahler
These observations are spurred by a recent court decision in Pokoik v Norsel Realties, 2017 NY Slip Op 50459(U) [Sup Ct NY County Apr. 12, 2017], in which Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Jeffrey K. [read post]
1 May 2017, 3:22 am by Peter Mahler
These observations are spurred by a recent court decision in Pokoik v Norsel Realties, 2017 NY Slip Op 50459(U) [Sup Ct NY County Apr. 12, 2017], in which Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Jeffrey K. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 4:28 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
During this time, Stacy's parents sometimes visited her at college, but their attitude toward Stacy's relationship with Marc did not change. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 4:21 am by Terry Hart
” Along the same lines, I suppose you could argue that it’s fair use to copy reality television shows so long as you watch them ironically. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 7:33 am by Jeff Welty
The State’s first move will be to argue that such searches were conducted in good faith reliance on existing precedent, namely State v. [read post]