Search for: "U. S. v. Lopez"
Results 101 - 120
of 126
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2018, 6:07 pm
United States 17-6856 Issue: Whether the “separate sovereign” concept actually exists when Congress’s plenary power over Indian tribes and the general erosion of any real tribal sovereignty is amplified by the Northern Cheyenne Tribe’s constitution in such a way that the petitioner’s prosecutions in both tribal and federal court violate the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 3:34 am
Lopez (1998) 66 Cal.App.4th 615, 629.)In re Malik J., supra.The court then took up Malik J. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:35 pm
United States 17-6856 Issue: Whether the “separate sovereign” concept actually exists when Congress’s plenary power over Indian tribes and the general erosion of any real tribal sovereignty is amplified by the Northern Cheyenne Tribe’s constitution in such a way that the petitioner’s prosecutions in both tribal and federal court violate the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:00 am
For the moment, let's put aside the fact that Vermont gave us Wyeth v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 12:44 pm
Delsa U. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 6:45 am
Russell v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:46 pm
The more recent cases of Lopez and Morrison do not apply to the individual mandate. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 4:00 pm
Estate of Andy Lopez 17-1354 Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 7:53 am
Lopez, 2019 WL 1370716 (Mich. 2019). [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Lopez-Cruz, 730 F.3d 803 (9th Cir. 2013), Border Patrol officers stopped the defendant’s vehicle, suspecting he might be involved in alien smuggling. [read post]
27 Feb 2021, 10:32 am
Lopez and Gonzales v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm
Harrison, 16-1094 (in which the court requested the SG’s views) and Kumar v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:54 pm
U. [read post]
27 May 2010, 3:40 pm
Lopez v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 2:53 pm
Lopez IV: A.R.S. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 1:37 pm
United States, 316 U.S. 129, 62 S.Ct. 993 (1942); Lopez v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 12:05 pm
See also Lopez v. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
The FDA’s M7 Guidance observes that “[s]tandard risk assessments of known carcinogens assume that cancer risk increases as a function of cumulative dose. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:56 pm
For at least some of the Constitution, I agree with Justice Harlan's famous dissent in Poe v. [read post]
