Search for: "U. S. v. Masters"
Results 1 - 20
of 235
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2018, 3:01 pm
S. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 3:01 pm
S. [read post]
24 May 2018, 2:11 pm
S. ___, ___ (2015) (slip op., at 6) (quoting North Dakota v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 3:59 pm
NO-FAULT - FORM OF ATTORNEY'S AFFIRMATION - CPLR ARTICLE 75 SPECIAL PROCEEDING TO VACATE MASTER ARBITRATION AWARDValentin Avanessov, Physician, PC a/a/o Azra Sabovic v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 5:30 pm
The F/V DAFFNIE master stayed with the skiff, and the crew aboard the F/V LOVIE JOANN assisted in the retrieval of the seine net. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
” On January 27, 2023—more than two years after Custodia filed its application for a master account—the FRBKC denied Custodia’s application. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 3:37 am
Similarly, unseaworthiness was a defense to criminal charges against seamen who refused to obey a ship master’s orders. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 2:00 am
In Wittman v Personhuballah, 578 U. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 9:06 pm
S&M Brands, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 6:14 am
In Texas v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Absolute Activist Value Master Fund Ltd. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:28 pm
” 35 U. [read post]
1 May 2007, 8:34 am
AT&T Corp., 550 U. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 9:12 pm
State v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:03 am
" The Appellate Division, noting that there "is no record support for the Hearing Officer's finding that [Petitioner] knew in advance that a master stream was being operated ... such that he could have left the building," concluded that "[u]nder these circumstances, the event that precipitated [Petitioner's] injuries was sudden, unexpected and not a risk inherent in [Petitioner's] regular duties as the incident would not… [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:03 am
" The Appellate Division, noting that there "is no record support for the Hearing Officer's finding that [Petitioner] knew in advance that a master stream was being operated ... such that he could have left the building," concluded that "[u]nder these circumstances, the event that precipitated [Petitioner's] injuries was sudden, unexpected and not a risk inherent in [Petitioner's] regular duties as the incident would not… [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:03 am
" The Appellate Division, noting that there "is no record support for the Hearing Officer's finding that [Petitioner] knew in advance that a master stream was being operated ... such that he could have left the building," concluded that "[u]nder these circumstances, the event that precipitated [Petitioner's] injuries was sudden, unexpected and not a risk inherent in [Petitioner's] regular duties as the incident would not… [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:03 am
" The Appellate Division, noting that there "is no record support for the Hearing Officer's finding that [Petitioner] knew in advance that a master stream was being operated ... such that he could have left the building," concluded that "[u]nder these circumstances, the event that precipitated [Petitioner's] injuries was sudden, unexpected and not a risk inherent in [Petitioner's] regular duties as the incident would not… [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 1:02 am
Prigg v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 6:43 am
They continued on to the master bedroom and viewed another stripped bed, as well as a trash can Marco had used as a vomit receptacle. [read post]