Search for: "U. S. v. Masters" Results 1 - 20 of 235
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2008, 3:59 pm
NO-FAULT - FORM OF ATTORNEY'S AFFIRMATION - CPLR ARTICLE 75 SPECIAL PROCEEDING TO VACATE MASTER ARBITRATION AWARDValentin Avanessov, Physician, PC a/a/o Azra Sabovic v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 5:30 pm by Joseph Stacey
The F/V DAFFNIE master stayed with the skiff, and the crew aboard the F/V LOVIE JOANN assisted in the retrieval of the seine net. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
” On January 27, 2023—more than two years after Custodia filed its application for a master account—the FRBKC denied Custodia’s application. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 3:37 am
Similarly, unseaworthiness was a defense to criminal charges against seamen who refused to obey a ship masters orders. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:03 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The Appellate Division, noting that there "is no record support for the Hearing Officer's finding that [Petitioner] knew in advance that a master stream was being operated ... such that he could have left the building," concluded that "[u]nder these circumstances, the event that precipitated [Petitioner's] injuries was sudden, unexpected and not a risk inherent in [Petitioner's] regular duties as the incident would not… [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:03 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The Appellate Division, noting that there "is no record support for the Hearing Officer's finding that [Petitioner] knew in advance that a master stream was being operated ... such that he could have left the building," concluded that "[u]nder these circumstances, the event that precipitated [Petitioner's] injuries was sudden, unexpected and not a risk inherent in [Petitioner's] regular duties as the incident would not… [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:03 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The Appellate Division, noting that there "is no record support for the Hearing Officer's finding that [Petitioner] knew in advance that a master stream was being operated ... such that he could have left the building," concluded that "[u]nder these circumstances, the event that precipitated [Petitioner's] injuries was sudden, unexpected and not a risk inherent in [Petitioner's] regular duties as the incident would not… [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:03 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The Appellate Division, noting that there "is no record support for the Hearing Officer's finding that [Petitioner] knew in advance that a master stream was being operated ... such that he could have left the building," concluded that "[u]nder these circumstances, the event that precipitated [Petitioner's] injuries was sudden, unexpected and not a risk inherent in [Petitioner's] regular duties as the incident would not… [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 6:43 am
They continued on to the master bedroom and viewed another stripped bed, as well as a trash can Marco had used as a vomit receptacle. [read post]