Search for: "U. S. v. Mccarthy" Results 21 - 40 of 75
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2019, 4:47 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
McCarthy, Chachanover & Rosado, LLP, 160 A.D.3d 475, 476 (1st Dept. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 4:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Utilisave, LLC v Fox Horan & Camerini, LLP  2018 NY Slip Op 33284(U)  December 18, 2018  Supreme Court, New York County  Docket Number: 652318/2014  Judge: Kathryn E. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 6:00 am
 At trial, Officer Robert McCarthy (Officer McCarthy), who had previously interacted with the defendant, answered affirmatively when asked, `[D]id you notify [the defendant] that he was not permitted to be on campus on the Boston University Campus or Boston University property? [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 4:06 pm
Pero también el derecho ha servido como trampolín o disparador para teorías filosóficas más amplias, como es el caso, p.ej., de Rawls.Lo que dice Ricoeur (vía Mara) es más sutil, mucho más, que decir -como se podría leer rústicamente- que "el derecho de uno termina donde empieza el derecho del otro". [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 8:57 am
Rev. 480 (1990), has been cited for the proposition that the brief that Dawn Johnsen wrote in Webster v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 2:21 am
McCarthy, Trademarks & Unfair Competition §18:48, p. 18–112 (4th ed. 2012) (“[U]ncontrolled and ‘naked’ licensing can result in such a loss of significance of a trademark that a federal registration should be cancelled”); Sun Banks of Fla., Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:31 am by Steve Baird
McCarthy, Trademarks & Unfair Competition §18:48, p. 18–112 (4th ed. 2012) (“[U]ncontrolled and ‘naked’ licensing can result in such a loss of significance of a trademark that a federal registration should be cancelled”); Sun Banks of Fla., Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Kraslow, P.C. v LoGiudice ;  2011 NY Slip Op 50823(U) ;  Decided on May 5, 2011 Appellate Term, Second Department. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 7:21 am by Joshua Matz
Circuit’s opinion in Latif v. [read post]