Search for: "U. S. v. Miranda*"
Results 21 - 40
of 127
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2019, 4:42 am
A is for Arrest, I like to do to stiffs B is for Baton, this tool I club you with C is for Criminals, all are bad guys D is for Defendant, people who always lie E is for Execute, it’s what we do with warrants F is for Forfeit, how cops civilly line their pockets G is for Guilty, the status of perps I pop H is for Handcuffs, what I slap on folks I drop I is for Innocent, which no one ever is, J is for Jail, where we lock the bad guys in K is for Kill, which we kinda do to dogs M is for… [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:09 am
Shannon’s article Prescribing a Balance: The Texas Legislative Responses to Sell v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 2:03 pm
That's a toughie. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 4:48 am
In its reply papers, Moretrench noted the First Department’s decision in Children’s Corner Learning Ctr. v A. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
Underwood, Attorney General, New York, NY (Anisha S. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm
(2) Is the district court’s order denying the appellants’ objections to the remedial map appealable under 28 U. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 4:00 pm
Arlene’s Flowers Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm
Harrison, 16-1094 (in which the court requested the SG’s views) and Kumar v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 1:01 pm
Annab v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:35 pm
United States 17-6856 Issue: Whether the “separate sovereign” concept actually exists when Congress’s plenary power over Indian tribes and the general erosion of any real tribal sovereignty is amplified by the Northern Cheyenne Tribe’s constitution in such a way that the petitioner’s prosecutions in both tribal and federal court violate the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am
There’s been plenty of commentary on Sessions v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 6:07 pm
United States 17-6856 Issue: Whether the “separate sovereign” concept actually exists when Congress’s plenary power over Indian tribes and the general erosion of any real tribal sovereignty is amplified by the Northern Cheyenne Tribe’s constitution in such a way that the petitioner’s prosecutions in both tribal and federal court violate the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 9:00 pm
The authors wrote, “The maximum observed log reduction of L. monocytogenes was 2.15 ± 0.04 for balsamic vinegar (50% (v/v)), 1.18 ± 0.06 for white wine vinegar ((50% (v/v)) and 1.13 ± 0.06 for acetic acid ((50% (v/v)). [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 9:01 am
U. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 11:53 am
’ [Commonwealth v.] [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 4:58 pm
U. [read post]
4 May 2017, 6:48 am
”: The Story of Kirksey v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 3:00 am
“U-K-A-S-E. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 7:41 am
As part of the Law Library’s ongoing commemoration of the 50th anniversary of the United States Supreme Court decision, Miranda v. [read post]
