Search for: "U. S. v. Mullens"
Results 1 - 4
of 4
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2007, 2:05 pm
Booker, 41 U. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 12:11 pm
Michael Mullen, formally certifying to Congress that the conditions set for the policy’s repeal to go into effect had been met. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:10 am
State v. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 2:20 pm
The court also held that the law, which limited itself to ads for handguns, and only those that were on store premises, was unconstitutionally underinclusive: "[U]nderinclusivity is relevant to Central Hudson's direct advancement prong because it 'may diminish the credibility of the government's rationale for restricting speech in the first place.'" For example, in Pitt News v. [read post]