Search for: "U. S. v. Muse"
Results 41 - 60
of 69
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2012, 7:08 am
Attorney O’s Midnight Musings Blog on Facebook for all blog posts from that blog as well as other legal news. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 2:32 pm
The decision just came down in a case called Bland v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 5:55 am
Here are today's must-reads: 1. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:00 am
In Attard Industries Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 12:37 pm
Attorney O’s Midnight Musings Blog on Facebook for all blog posts from that blog as well as other legal news. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 6:00 am
S. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 12:35 pm
(For more on random music generators, see the discussion in Alan Durham, The Random Muse: Authorship and Indeterminacy, 44 Wm. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 6:58 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 9:06 am
Attorney O’s Midnight Musings Blog on Facebook for all blog posts from that blog as well as other legal news. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 1:08 pm
The IPKat's rapid response to the Australian ruling in Roadshow v iiNet on ISP liability for authorising copyright infringement. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 2:20 pm
Co., 272 U. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
Tessa Structures LLC) the U. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:57 pm
U. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 8:19 am
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) New York Field Office on July 8, 2011 released the following: “NORFOLK, VA—Three men from Somalia have been charged in a 26-count superseding indictment with the kidnapping, hostage-taking, and murder of four U.S. citizens during the alleged piracy against the S/V Quest. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:21 pm
Sung Bok Lee v Metropolitan Prop. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 7:00 am
In Summit Community Bank v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:28 am
S. ex rel Acoustical Concepts, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:58 am
"O, for a muse of fire": energy law as federal ceremony. 5 Envtl. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:12 am
CAFC: Bilski V. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 2:40 am
It contains, among other things, articles on (i) the US Supreme Court’s damages analysis in Lucent v Microsoft from an economist’s perspective which proposes new guidelines for evaluating patent damages in concentrated, high tech industries and (ii) the evolution of quilts from utility items to works of art proposing strong copyright law protection for quilt designs. [read post]
