Search for: "U. S. v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm by ligitsec
105 S.Ct. 2218 85 L.Ed.2d 588 HARPER & ROW, PUBLISHERS, INC. and the Reader’s Digest Association, Inc., Petitionersv.NATION ENTERPRISES and the Nation Associates, Inc. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 4:21 am by Terry Hart
Subscribers to TVEyes gain access, not only to the news that is presented, but to the presentations themselves, as colored, processed, and criticized by commentators, and as abridged, modified, and enlarged by news broadcasts. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
Litvin, New York, New York, for amicus National Basketball Association. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
”[29] And that’s a short list. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 11:13 pm by Michael Geist
Y is for director Tony Young, one of hundreds of film directors whose work was made openly available on the National Film Board’s website. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 2:00 am
(Public Knowledge)   US Copyright – Decisions S D Ohio: RIAA’s need for discovery was not so urgent: Elektra Entertainment Group, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
This is unconstitutional, given modern First Amendment precedents and our nations and Minnesota’s commitment to the freedom of speech. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by Terry Hart
S. 82 (1879); and Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WIPO Copyright Committee 16th session to discuss Broadcast Treaty, new proposal for exceptions and limitations agreement: (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (IPwar’s), (Intellectual Property Watch), (KEI), (Public Knowledge), (IP Justice), (IP Justice),… [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm by Guest Author
 As FCC Commissioners, we are deeply concerned that Big Tech’s expansive position threatens free speech and is inconsistent with the nations communications regulatory framework. [read post]