Search for: "U. S. v. Pappas"
Results 1 - 19
of 19
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2014, 3:20 am
Pappas v Schatz, 2014 NY Slip Op 30946(U) [Sup Ct NY County Apr. 9, 2014]. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 5:00 pm
After going through the relevant provisions in the Partnership Agreement, the Commercial Division then analyzed two cases cited by the defendants, Pappas v. 38-40 LLC, 2018 NY Slip Op 30329(U) (Sup. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 3:46 am
That is just one lesson from a recent decision by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Saliann Scarpulla in Pappas v 38-40 LLC, 2018 NY Slip Op 30329(U) [Sup Ct NY County Feb. 22, 2018]). [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
Battaglia as he paints a vivid picture of contradictory, ambiguous and incomplete evidence in a five-year court contest over the stock ownership of two Brooklyn-based businesses in Matter of Pappas (Corfian Enterprises, Ltd.), 2009 NY Slip Op 50109(U) (Sup Ct Kings County Jan. 23, 2009). [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 4:34 am
We previously covered the cases of Budis v Skoutelas, Short Form Order, Index No. 702060/13 [Sup Ct, Queens County July 16, 2014] and Pappas v 38-40 LLC, 2018 NY Slip Op 30329(U) [Sup Ct NY County Feb. 22, 2018], in which the court held that the estate of a deceased LLC member had no standing to assert derivative claims on the LLC’s behalf. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 3:49 am
Statute of Limitations Defeats Claim for Wrongful Reduction of LLC Membership Interest Konstantinidis v Pappas, 2018 NY Slip Op 32281(U) [Sup Ct Kings County May 25, 2018], decided by Brooklyn Commercial Division Justice Lawrence S. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 2:00 am
Pappas v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 5:10 am
Crowley, Leslie Wharton, Proportionality in the Post-Hoc Analysis of Pre-Litigation Preservation Decisions, 37 U. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 4:54 am
Tradesman Program Managers LLC v Doyle, 2020 NY Slip Op 32452[U] [Sup Ct, Kings County 2020]; Barrison v D’Amato & Lynch, LLP, 2019 NY Slip Op 30905[U] [Sup Ct, NY County]; Lentini v 219 W. 20th St. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 3:44 am
The Pappas case, about which I wrote here and here, is a good example of a case in which the respondent’s repudiation of the petitioner’s stock interest was the primary factor supporting the court’s finding of oppressive conduct. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 3:34 am
Rennert v S.M.R. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 4:46 am
The upshot of the three cases — Centro Empresarial v America Movil, Arfa v Zamir, and Pappas v Tzolis — is that it depends not only on the particular language of the waiver or release but also on the sophistication of the complaining party and whether, at the time of the transaction, the complaining party had reason to distrust the other party such that it could not reasonably rely on the latter’s representations. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
While we recognize that "this Court's authority 'is as broad as that of the trial court' and includes the power to 'render the judgment it finds warranted by the facts, taking into account in a close case the fact that the trial judge had the advantage of seeing the witnesses'" (Matter of Pappas v Corfian Enters., Ltd., 76 AD3d 679, 679 [2010], quoting Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc. v Town of Bedford, 60 NY2d 492,… [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:05 am
U. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
A&M U. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 3:37 am
The court’s decision in PF2 Securities Evaluations, Inc. v Fillebeen, 2015 NY Slip Op 30436(U) [Sup Ct NY County Mar. 26, 2015], invoked in tandem the majority shareholders’ fiduciary duty and the minority shareholder’s rights to be “free of oppressive conduct” and “in the event of a consensual buy-out . . . to receive a fair market value for his stock after fair and complete disclosure and valuation. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:24 am
Ironically, Carter did not cite the one case I know about in which a court suggested in dicta that Section 1104-a (d) is inapplicable in the absence of a Section 1118 buy-out — the 2010 decision in Pappas v Fotinos which I wrote about here. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
Pappas (1988) 203 Cal.App.3d 201, 208, italics added.) [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 12:33 pm
¿Qué provoca que el constituyente escoja uno u otro calificativo para la dogmática? [read post]
