Search for: "U. S. v. Paulsen" Results 1 - 6 of 6
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Four: Trump’s Argument That His Tenure as President Did Not Subject Him to Section 3 Because the President is Not an “Officer of the United States”
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  There’s nothing further in the brief arguing that Section 3’s disqualification doesn’t extend to the presidency. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
June 2, 1952 – The Supreme Court Decides Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer
27 Nov 2012, 2:03 am by rhapsodyinbooks
OctoPOTUS, illustration by Jonathan Burton for U. of Chicago Magazine review of Posner and Vermeule’s book Eric A. [read post]
Legal Legacy - http://legallegacy.wordpress.com
[Eugene Volokh] New Univ. of Texas Law Class on "Understanding Conservative Legal Thought"
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
Whole Women's Health v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Recent Law Review Articles -- December 2011
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm by Pace Law School Library
L. 571-590 (2011).Paulsen, Aurora. [read post]
PEN-e: Pace Environmental Notes - http://paceeenvironmentalnotes.blogspot.com/
Legal Theory Lexicon: The New Originalism
5 Jun 2022, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Finally, Randy Barnett and Evan Bernick have argued that cases in the construction zone should be resolved by implementing rules that conform to the original purpose or function of the relevant constitutional provision(s). [read post]
Legal Theory Blog - https://lsolum.typepad.com/legaltheory/
[Josh Blackman] Louisville Daily Journal (April 1868): The President is not an "Officer of the United States"
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/