Search for: "U. S. v. Perez*" Results 21 - 40 of 122
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
Entities subject to the Open Meetings Law and the Freedom of Information LawMatter of Reese v Daines, 2008 NY Slip Op 51879(U), decided on September 15, 2008, Supreme Court, Erie County, Patrick H. [read post]
2 May 2013, 2:25 pm by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Paul, as well as a second qui tam complaint pending against the City, in exchange for the City’s commitment to withdraw its appeal in Magner v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
The Board employed the categorical approach focusing on the “minimum conduct that has a realistic probability of being prosecuted under the statute of conviction, rather than on the facts underlying the respondent’s particular violation of the statute” (citing Moncrieffe v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
The Board employed the categorical approach focusing on the “minimum conduct that has a realistic probability of being prosecuted under the statute of conviction, rather than on the facts underlying the respondent’s particular violation of the statute” (citing Moncrieffe v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 12:43 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Morgan Buying Keyword Ads on People’s Names Doesn’t Violate Their Publicity Rights–Habush v. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 12:17 am
As Defendant notes, the Ninth Circuit's recent opinion on the issue in Lively v. [read post]