Search for: "U. S. v. Rodriguez" Results 1 - 20 of 155
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2023, 5:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Holland & Knight LLC v Walsam 316, LLC 2023 NY Slip Op 33748(U)October 17, 2023 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 654470/2022 Judge: Dakota D. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 2:25 pm by Howard Knopf
Ariel and I, along with a very smart young law professor named David Lametti, who later became Minister of Justice, made the prevailing arguments in the SCC in the 2015 case of Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiffs assert, upon information and belief, that defendant Markowitz was an investor in at least one of Rodriguezs mortgagees (id. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 9:35 am by Ezra Rosser
New Article: Matthew Patrick Shaw, The Public Right to Education, 89(5) U. of Chi. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 2:52 pm by bndmorris
Gonzalez’s review The New Batson: Opening the Door of the Jury Deliberation Room after Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 11:15 am by fjhinojosa
Gonzalez’s article The New Batson: Opening the Door of the Jury Deliberation Room after Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Favors v Cuomo, 2012 WL 928223 *2, 2012 US Dist LEXIS 36910, *10 [ED NY, Mar. 19, 2012, No. 11-CV-5632, Raggi, Lynch, and Irizarry, JJ.]; Rodriguez v Pataki, 2002 WL 1058054, *7, 2002 US Dist LEXIS, *25-27 [SD NY 2002, May 24, 2002, No. 02 Civ. 618, Walker, Ch. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Favors v Cuomo, 2012 WL 928223 *2, 2012 US Dist LEXIS 36910, *10 [ED NY, Mar. 19, 2012, No. 11-CV-5632, Raggi, Lynch, and Irizarry, JJ.]; Rodriguez v Pataki, 2002 WL 1058054, *7, 2002 US Dist LEXIS, *25-27 [SD NY 2002, May 24, 2002, No. 02 Civ. 618, Walker, Ch. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Citing  Matter of Fernandez v Rodriguez, 180 AD3d 897, the Appellate Division said that the hearing officer resolved the issue of credibility as between the two witnesses, and it discerned "no basis to disturb that determination. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Citing  Matter of Fernandez v Rodriguez, 180 AD3d 897, the Appellate Division said that the hearing officer resolved the issue of credibility as between the two witnesses, and it discerned "no basis to disturb that determination. [read post]
18 May 2021, 12:44 pm by Josh Blackman
Rodriguez (2018), and Justice Kagan's concurrence in Seila Law (2020). [read post]