Search for: "U. S. v. Samples" Results 41 - 60 of 229
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2011, 4:52 am by Sean Wajert
  Let's take one at a time and start with Dukes v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:57 pm
  That approach was also affirmed by the current Supreme Court in the ITW v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 9:00 am by Paula Bremner
In Aker Biomarine AS v Neptune Technologies & Bioressources Inc. 2013 QCCS 4841 (“Aker v Neptune”)[1], the Quebec court quickly denied Aker’s request based on R v Zingre /Quebec Civil Procedure Rules and a few blatant problems: (1) although Aker’s request was “significantly reduced” after the Quebec court criticized its scope, Aker maintained its request for sample testing/extraction documents regarding the… [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:51 pm
Martinez testified that although the precise numbers fluctuate, the percentages in the four-month sample period were generally reflective of the population of vehicles the MVD monitors for any given period.State v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:43 am by Shawn R. Dominy
  The opinion observes there is physical intrusion under the skin, part of the person’s body is extracted, and there is more information than just the person’s BAC in a blood sample. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:43 am by Shawn R. Dominy
  The opinion observes there is physical intrusion under the skin, part of the person’s body is extracted, and there is more information than just the person’s BAC in a blood sample. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 7:25 am by Ben
Germany's Federal Court found for Kraftwerk, in part on the basis that Pelham could have easily recreated the sound he sampled but  four years later the German Constitutional Court overturned that judgement, finding that Pelham's "artistic freedom". outweighed Kraftwerk's copyright claim. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am by Jack McNeill, Associate Library Director
Test methods matter: representative sampling and Clean Air Act test methods can survive EPA’s credible evidence rule. 25 J. [read post]