Search for: "U. S. v. Sellers" Results 81 - 100 of 240
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2018, 1:57 pm
Therefore, the Chinese sellers urged, they are shielded from liability under U. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 6:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Supreme Court dramatically altered the country’s E-commerce landscape with its decision in South Dakota v Wayfair, 585 U. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:17 am by Steven Boutwell
  South Dakota’s law required an out-of-state seller to collect and remit use tax as if the seller had an in-state physical presence if the seller, on an annual basis, either delivered more than $100,000 of goods or services into the state or engaged in 200 or more transactions for the delivery of goods or services into the state.[7]  South Dakota’s law was tailored to foreclose the possibility of retroactive application and to… [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 9:38 am by Buckingham
This is a follow-up to our recent post regarding the pending Supreme Court case South Dakota v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 12:16 pm by Daniel K. McClendon
  Second, the Senators argued that the overturn of Quill would not mean the Court could not protect interstate sellers though other doctrines, such as the balancing test in Pike v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 12:48 pm by Jim Martin
Supreme Court Records and Briefs (November 18, 2010)(Christine Sellers) [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 10:00 am by Jordan Brunner
Addressing Kaspersky’s argument that its injury stems from its inability to sell its products to the U. [read post]