Search for: "U. S. v. Sherwood"
Results 21 - 33
of 33
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2019, 11:14 pm
The double curse was at work in Roy Food and Wine LLC v Meregalli, 2019 NY Slip Op 32875(U) [Sup Ct NY County Sept. 25, 2019], decided last month by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice O. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 4:53 am
Peter Sherwood. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 7:43 am
Slip Op 51759[U], *30). [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 7:43 am
Slip Op 51759[U], *30). [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 8:00 pm
Vance, STATE LAW PREFERENCE ACTIONS: STILL ALIVE AFTER SHERWOOD PARTNERS V. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 3:34 am
Peter Sherwood in Rennert v S.M.R. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 4:08 am
Peter Sherwood granting summary judgment declaring the Disputed Amendment unenforceable, and a subsequent order dismissing most of the limited partner’s Second Amended Complaint. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 1:22 pm
Más después del 15. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 1:51 am
Mace v Tunick The analysis got more complicated in the wake of the Appellate Division, Second Department’s 2017 decision in the Mace v Tunick case that I wrote about here and here. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:24 am
Ironically, Carter did not cite the one case I know about in which a court suggested in dicta that Section 1104-a (d) is inapplicable in the absence of a Section 1118 buy-out — the 2010 decision in Pappas v Fotinos which I wrote about here. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 4:57 am
That was the question posed in Yakuel v Gluck, 2020 NY Slip Op 31251(U) [Sup Ct NY County May 7, 2020], in which Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Joel M. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• Rose U. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• Rose U. [read post]
