Search for: "U. S. v. Sotomayor"
Results 1 - 20
of 791
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2009, 9:41 am
S. [read post]
28 May 2019, 7:32 am
S. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Concluding that it4 TRUMP v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 11:14 am
Justice Sotomayor’s opinion begins: The Torture Victim Protection Act of 1991 (TVPA or Act), 106 Stat. 73, note following 28 U. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 12:10 pm
Ct. 2056, 2069-71 (2016) (Sotomayor, J., dissenting). [2] Whren v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 1:10 pm
Torres, The Miner’s Canary 274-283 (2002). [7] Atwater v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 2:10 pm
Per Justice Scalia’s majority opinion (joined by Justices Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, and Sotomayor), the case “consider[s] whether Ex parte Young, 209 U. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 12:04 pm
S. 562, 572 (2011). [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 5:46 am
U.S. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:55 am
To Justice Sotomayor’s point, sometimes certification will be just the right lever to pull. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 1:48 pm
S. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 1:48 pm
S. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 5:56 am
S. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 7:09 am
S. ___. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 4:56 am
S. ___ (2015) (per curiam); Taylor v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 2:04 pm
Sotomayor, Unanimous) [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 12:40 pm
S., at 236—a decision more akin to a district court’s preenforcement review of a subpoena than the warrantless searches and seizures we considered in Ornelas v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 11:59 am
Arizona, 384 U. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 6:15 am
What does this mean about Justice Sotomayor’s view of class actions and the scope of the Due Process Clause? [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 7:04 am
Bollinger, 539 U. [read post]
