Search for: "U. S. v. Strauss"
Results 21 - 40
of 40
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013)In 2010, the faculty at Penn State Law approved the creation of a new concept course, to be named "Elements of Law". [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am
That is how today’s “constitutional question” ought to be formulated, by contrast with the 18th and 19th century question of the constitution of nation-states. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 10:46 am
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, L. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 5:20 am
V. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 8:51 am
Hohnbaum responded (unsurprisingly) that IWC v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 6:12 pm
Geneva Pharms., Inc., 344 F.3d 1294 (11th Cir. 2003) and Schering-Plough Corp. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:30 am
David Strauss, The Modernizing Mission of Judicial Review, 76 U. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:35 am
in Soussis v Lazer, Aptheker, Rosella & Yedid, P.C.;2010 NY Slip Op 32991(U);October 12, 2010 Supreme Court, Nassau County;Judge: Anthony L. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 3:17 am
Carl v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
Plaintiff commenced this personal injury action against the New York City Transit Authority (NYCTA), the vehicle's titled owner and lessor, the vehicle's driver, and the vehicle's registered owner, American Transit, Inc. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
Strauss, W. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am
The California Supreme Court swiftly followed suit in Strauss v Horton, upholding the passage of Proposition 8, but applying that referendum prospectively, thereby preserving the approximately 18,000 marriages that had been performed prior to the passage of the referendum; and perhaps unwittingly creating an arbitrary class of persons to which other gays can point in an equal protection analysis. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
The California Supreme Court swiftly followed suit in Strauss v Horton, upholding the passage of Proposition 8, but applying that referendum prospectively, thereby preserving the approximately 18,000 marriages that had been performed prior to the passage of the referendum; and perhaps unwittingly creating an arbitrary class of persons to which other gays can point in an equal protection analysis. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 12:44 pm
Perry, 558 U. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 9:28 pm
Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P., 105 S.W.3d 244, 250 (Tex. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 3:00 am
This 9th Circuit's reasoning in Douglas was extended in Harris v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 5:11 am
Nguyen v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:37 am
A recent case Carl v. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 12:46 am
Last week the U. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 10:24 am
Strauss, The Anti-Formalist, 74 U Chi L Rev 1885 (2007) Cass R. [read post]
