Search for: "U. S. v. Taylor"
Results 101 - 120
of 199
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2023, 3:24 pm
Troops, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 12:56 pm
Most of Russell’s paper concentrates on Simkins’ career at UT, as well as the 1954 decision (five weeks after Brown v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
”Citing Harlow v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
, Haney v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:17 am
" According to the original and superseding indictments filed in Manhattan federal court: The original indictment, United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:17 am
" According to the original and superseding indictments filed in Manhattan federal court: The original indictment, United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 9:25 am
In NTP, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:04 am
”) (emphasis added); Taylor v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:04 am
”) (emphasis added); Taylor v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
12 Oct 2019, 7:09 am
Continental v. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 4:43 am
Taylor, 529 U. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:28 am
U. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 5:15 am
Taylor, 487 U. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:58 am
The district argued that PERB had exclusive jurisdiction over such issues.The Commissioner ruled that his disposition of the appeal considered matters unrelated to the Taylor Law and thus his dismissal of Fusco’s appeal and deferral to PERB was not required.In addition, the district asked the Commissioner for permission to submit two additional documents it claimed addressed substantive issues related to Fusco’s conduct after it had filed its answer to… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
: Trek Bicycle Corporation v Trek Winery, LLC (Trademark Blog of the Trademark Lawyer's Mind) District Court C D California: No preliminary injunction in ‘Planet [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
: Trek Bicycle Corporation v Trek Winery, LLC (Trademark Blog of the Trademark Lawyer's Mind) District Court C D California: No preliminary injunction in ‘Planet [read post]
