Search for: "U. S. v. Wells" Results 61 - 80 of 4,225
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2024, 5:15 pm by Administrator
Rather, where a court finds that an arrest is made in breach of the Charter, it will be necessary to consider such a breach in the s. 24(2) analysis, including the impacts on the accused’s Charter-protected interests (see R. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 Trump concedes, as he must (Br. at 24-25), that the President is an “officer” for purposes of the Constitution.[1]  After all, the Constitution refers to the President’s “office” or to the “Office of the President” almost two dozen times.[2]  He insists, however, that the qualifying phrase “of the United States” in Section 3 serves to exclude the President, as well as the Vice-President, Senators and… [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
”[10]  The June 1, 1972 Report of the Advisory Committee on Enforcement Policies and Practices—now commonly referred to as the Wells Report—included a lengthy discussion about the settlement of Commission enforcement actions, and made several recommendations related to the settlement process.[11]  The Commission had decades of experience settling cases, through both settlements on a no-admit/no-deny basis and settlements allowing defendants to deny… [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am by Daniel J. Gilman
” I recommend it (and put it in the well-populated camp that rates the guidelines still-terrible-but-slightly-less-bad). [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 4:06 am by Rob Robinson
That same year, in Caratube v Kazakhstan, confidential information was leaked from the Kazakh government’s IT system and the claimant eventually obtained some of the leaked documents. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 3:32 am by Peter J. Sluka
  A member might also take guidance from the First Department’s decision in Lemle v Lemle, 92 AD3d 494, 497 [1st Dept 2012]. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm by Guest Author
At bottom, ruling in favor of Big Tech in NetChoice would effectively require the Supreme Court to disregard decades of First Amendment precedent and throw asunder legions of well-established antidiscrimination laws. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 5:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Warshaw Burstein, LLP v Colambda Tech., Inc. 2023 NY Slip Op 34435(U) December 14, 2023 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 150283/2023Judge: Louis L. [read post]