Search for: "U. S. v. Winston"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2023, 9:45 am
” The complaint in B.L.R. v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 6:45 pm
The reasoning: Where a sophisticated client imposes a strategic decision on counsel, the client’s action absolves the attorney from liability for malpractice (Town of North Hempstead v Winston & Strawn, LLP, 28 AD3d 746 [2006]; Stolmeier v Fields, 280 AD2d 342 [2001]). [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 3:03 am
“Where a sophisticated client imposes a strategic decision on counsel, the client’s action absolves the attorney from liability for malpractice (Town of North Hempstead v Winston & Strawn, LLP, 28 AD3d 746 [2006]; Stolmeier v Fields, 280 AD2d 342 [2001]). [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 3:23 am
“Where a sophisticated client imposes a strategic decision on counsel, the client’s action absolves the attorney from liability for malpractice (Town of North Hempstead v Winston & Strawn, LLP, 28 AD3d 746 [2006]; Stolmeier v Fields, 280 AD2d 342 [2001]). [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 4:45 am
An exception exists and liability may be extended where a plaintiff sufficiently pleads acts of fraud, collusion, malicious acts or other special circumstances (see Leggiadro, Ltd. v Winston & Strawn, 119 AD3d 442 [Pt Dept 2014]). [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 11:28 am
" - Winston Churchill (United States Constitution) © 2006-2009 Sex Offender Issues , All Rights Reserved [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:11 pm
That's what happened in Winston v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 7:40 am
Labor Executives’ Ass’n, 489 U.S. 602, 616 (1989) (citing Winston v. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 5:10 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 5:15 am
Works of Malcom X, T.S.Eliot, Winston Churchill became copyright-free, at least in some countries. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 5:15 am
Works of Malcom X, T.S.Eliot, Winston Churchill became copyright-free, at least in some countries. [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 1:36 pm
In the representative case of Pfeffer v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
S. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:36 am
Tomasovic, Brian S. and Stephen V. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 3:25 am
See Auerbach v. [read post]
14 May 2021, 3:34 am
Hempstead v Winston & Strawn, LLP, 28 AD3d 746, 749 [2d Dept 2006]). [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 11:19 am
Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 1:39 pm
That was the issue in today's ruling in People v. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:13 am
Ohio 2005); and People v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am
Family Court Act § 412(2)(d) was amended to read as follows: (d) "income cap" shall mean up to and including one hundred eighty-four thousand dollars of the payor's annual income; provided, however, beginning March first, two thousand twenty and every two years thereafter, the income cap amount shall increase by the sum of the average annual percentage changes in the consumer … [read post]
