Search for: "U. S. v. Zimmerman"
Results 1 - 20
of 35
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2020, 7:07 am
Case citation: Zimmerman v. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 3:31 pm
S. 91, 109; Jerome v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 4:38 am
., LLC v Simbari Design Architecture, PLLC 2019 NY Slip Op 50331(U) Decided on March 19, 2019 Supreme Court, Cortland County Guy, J. is a companion case to Universe Ave. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 8:59 pm
United States, 164 U. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 7:24 am
Zimmerman rejected that argument, and “courts have refused to extend Marsh’s holding to social media cases” (cite to Prager U). [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 7:15 am
The Ninth Circuit rejected identical Lanham Act claims in Prager U. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 6:15 am
Zimmerman Brush Co., 455 U. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:54 am
S. 514, 526–527 (2001); Holder v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 9:38 am
Facebook and Prager U. v YouTube. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 8:21 am
LinkedIn Section 230 Preempts Another Facebook Account Termination Case–Zimmerman v. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 4:54 pm
Milkovich v. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 7:09 am
The court says Prager U expressly rejected that argument. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 7:33 am
This argument is foreclosed by Prager U. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 5:48 am
S. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 4:43 am
” “Plaintiff cannot show that defendant’s alleged deceits were the proximate cause of any injury, except perhaps “excess legal expenses” incurred in the Apollo action (see Melcher v Greenberg Traurig LLP, 135 AD3d 547, 554 [Pt Dept 2016]; see also Zimmerman v Kohn, 125 AD3d 413 [1st Dept 2015] [cited in Melcher]). [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 6:40 am
” Cite to Prager U. v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 10:29 am
The case is USA v Gupta, U.S. [read post]
8 May 2012, 10:29 am
The case is USA v Gupta, U.S. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 6:33 pm
These arguments may have even more force in light of the Supreme Court's decisions in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 10:33 am
Nov. 18, 2021) The court literally could not be bothered to explain itself beyond a cite to Prager U: The district court properly dismissed Perez’s action because Perez failed to allege facts sufficient to state a plausible claim….see also Prager U. v. [read post]
