Search for: "U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board, Petitioner, v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, Respondent" Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am by Abbott & Kindermann
 The petition asks the court to determine whether or not the Board and Siskiyou have the authority under the public trust doctrine to protect public trust resources. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 2:33 pm
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative LawSource: Justia October 28, 2011 Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 9:14 am
Plaintiffs alleged that they had consequently been deprived of the full protections provided to employees under the California Labor Code, including overtime and minimum wages, reimbursement of business expenses and deductions wrongfully taken from wages, and meal period pay. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 10:12 am by John Elwood
The PSBA, in turn, argued that the First Amendment protects its right to sue in state court, and it defended against Campbell’s federal lawsuit by invoking the Noerr-Pennington doctrine, which shields constitutionally protected conduct from civil liability, subject to certain exceptions. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am by John Elwood
 The petitions filed in appellate courts were consolidated in the U.S. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 7:39 pm by Wolfgang Demino
No. 17-cv-01323 (GMS)PLAINTIFF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU’SCONSOLIDATED RESPONSE TO MOTIONS TO INTERVENEPlaintiff Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“Bureau”) hereby responds to the motions to intervene filed by Ambac Assurance Corporation (“Ambac”) (D.I. 4); Transworld Systems Inc. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 2:19 pm
Air Climate Systems, Inc. and All Climate Systems, Inc. (30-CA-17695; 352 NLRB No. 75) Janesville, WI May 30, 2008. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 7:39 pm by Wolfgang Demino
No. 17-cv-01323 (GMS)PLAINTIFF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU’SCONSOLIDATED RESPONSE TO MOTIONS TO INTERVENEPlaintiff Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“Bureau”) hereby responds to the motions to intervene filed by Ambac Assurance Corporation (“Ambac”) (D.I. 4); Transworld Systems Inc. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
Labor Secretary Hilda Solis by OSHA chief David Michaels and Deborah Greenfield, acting deputy solicitor of the department. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Companies responding to Staff investigations may also experience accelerated timelines and less flexibility in responding to subpoenas and information requests. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm by The Legal Blog
In fact the Employee Polygraph Protection Act, 1998 was designed to restrict their use for employee screening. [read post]