Search for: "U.S. POSTAL SERVICE v. LETTER CARRIERS"
Results 21 - 33
of 33
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2013, 11:26 am
Postal Service investigator notices a "suspicious package." [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 7:19 pm
United States Postal Service, No. 09-1964San Francisco v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 7:19 pm
United States Postal Service, No. 09-1964 San Francisco v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 11:21 am
Postal Service letter carrier who was injured on the job and again in a later car accident - is ineligible for Social Security benefits, the Court remanded the action for further administrative proceedings. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 4:25 am
Postal Service was not required to accommodate a Seventh Day Adventist letter carrier's request to have every Saturday off. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 9:00 am
You see, Disandro is a letter carrier for the United States Postal Service and on the day of her fine in Temecula she was using her personal vehicle to do her job. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 12:11 pm
For example, if a person sends a letter in what the Postal Service used to call “Fourth Class” mail — that is, mail that the Postal Service reserves the right to open — then it is not protected by the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 9:06 pm
A religious Jewish letter carrier was found to have not made out a claim for failure to accommodate his religious... [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 5:55 am
Postal Service as a full-time letter carrier, Martin Tepper became a Messianic Jew, strictly observing the Sabbath every Saturday. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 11:10 pm
Potter, (6th Cir., Oct. 15, 2007), the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Title VII religious accommodation and religious discrimination claims brought by a letter carrier against the Chagrin Falls, Ohio branch of the United States Postal Service.Letter carrier Martin Tepper is a Messianic Jew who observes Saturday as his Sabbath. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 12:03 pm
Letter writers knew the wax would probably fail, the letters would come unsealed and postal employees would probably read them. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 5:21 am
In the latter scenarios, the sender or receiver of a closed letter or package actually relinquishes control of the container and cannot immediately repossess the letter or package -- it is in the physical possession of the postal carrier and/or common carrier outside the dominion and control of the sender or recipient. [read post]
27 Jul 2006, 5:37 am
[T]he sender or receiver of a closed letter or package actually relinquishes control of the container and cannot immediately repossess the letter or package -- it is in the physical possession of the postal carrier and/or common carrier outside the dominion and control of the sender or recipient. [read post]
