Search for: "U.S. v. Alvarado" Results 61 - 77 of 77
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2021, 1:10 pm by Andrew Hamm
Alvarado by applying an overly specific “unreasonable application” analysis; and (3) whether the 2nd Circuit violated the harmless error standard in Brecht v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 11:36 am by Anthony Zaller
Clemens Pottery Co., 328 U.S. 680, 692, 66 S.Ct. 1187, 90 L.Ed. 1515 (1946), superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in IBP, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 11:46 am by Beck, et al.
Medtronic, Inc., 451 F.3d 104, 125-26 (2d Cir. 2006), aff'd on other grounds, 552 U.S. 312 (2008) (you know what). [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am by Katherine Kelley
Instead, I consulted press accounts, Justice Department press statements, research papers, university publications, teen magazines, business publications, the Federal Trade Commission, women’s legal defense advocacy pages, U.S. [read post]
The rate of pay required for non-exempt employees is the regular rate during the pay period the leave is taken if the employer uses the workweek method, or alternatively the employer can use a 90-day lookback for determining the average regular rate, that is generally the same as with the normal state paid sick leave law (unless the employer has any flat-sum bonuses involved, in which case the employer will need to use the Alvarado-method of calculating the regular rate, as detailed here). [read post]