Search for: "U.S. v. Barker"
Results 1 - 20
of 221
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2024, 2:02 pm
Chamber of Com. of the U.S. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:12 am
Campbell Barker of the U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 2:48 am
Barker, 279 F.2d 642, 646 (C.A. 9, 1960). [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:47 am
Barker , 279 F.2d 642, 646 (C.A. 9, 1960). [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 1:12 pm
Tam, 582 U.S. 218 (2017),and Iancu v. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 8:27 am
And the correct test to determine whether that has occurred, the state insists, is the one that the lower court applied in this case: the “speedy trial” test outlined in Barker v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 4:10 pm
District Court in Barker v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
According to the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), acts of violence is currently the third-leading cause of fatal occupational injuries in the U.S. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 1:16 pm
In Smith v. the United States, 599 U.S. ____ (2023), the U.S. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
In Smith v. the United States, 599 U.S. ____ (2023), the U.S. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 7:33 am
However, the U.S. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 12:14 pm
Barker (1817) 15 U.S. (2 Wheat.) 395, 395 [4 L.Ed. 271], which held that private citizens may not recover costs from the federal government in exactly six words: "The United States never pay costs. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Alabama, 124 U.S. 465 (1888). 2139 Sprint Communications Co. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 1:34 pm
” (U.S. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 8:35 am
State v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 2:52 pm
McKinney, U.S. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 5:57 am
Supreme Court established a four-part test for evaluating speedy trial claims in 1972’s Barker v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
The guidelines say candidates can accept cryptocurrency donations if they immediately convert the digital currency into U.S. dollars. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Evidence presented by the House committee investigating the attack on the U.S. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Supreme Court overturn Roe v. [read post]