Search for: "U.S. v. Barrett*"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,038
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2024, 5:25 am
Kirtz, a unanimous Court held that a consumer may sue the U.S. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
Finally, U.S. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:44 am
Celebrezze, 460 U.S. at 786-87 n.7.) [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm
U.S. const. art. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:42 am
When the U.S. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 11:04 am
Supreme Court in the Macquarie Infrastructure Corporation v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
" U.S. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
(Infodocket) ICYMI, Trump v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:03 pm
On April 29, 2021, the U.S. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am
Founding Both the 1777 Articles of Confederation and the U.S. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Trump v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 8:53 am
Rapanos v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm
V. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 6:38 am
By Lene Powell, J.D.The U.S. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:44 pm
When he filed a takings claim in state court, Texas removed the case to federal court under 28 U.S. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 4:31 pm
Dávila v. [read post]