Search for: "U.S. v. Bey" Results 41 - 60 of 107
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2018, 9:50 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 47329, Feb. 27, 2018) and in a suit by a Muslim inmate ordered that defendants file further pleadings explaining the prison policy that prevents plaintiff from wearing kufi caps.In Adams-Bey v. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 9:35 am by Howard Friedman
The court allowed plaintiff to proceed with his complaints regarding a TB screening injection that contains alcohol; the common fare diet that he claims does not satisfy his religious beliefs; and food allegedly served under unsanitary conditions.In Hickman-Bey v. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 8:36 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 40992 (D NJ, March 29, 2016), a New Jersey federal district court permitted a Muslim inmate to move ahead with his free exercise and RLUIPA claims that the prison chaplain denied his request for vegetarian meals.In Bey v. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 7:00 am by Howard Friedman
As to injunctive relief, the court gave defendants 30 days to show that their subsequent change in the breakfast policy is permanent.In Bey v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 1:20 am
Plaintiff's grievance concerned seizure of his religious material.In Turner-Bey v. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 3:35 am
However the court rejected the claim insofar as it alleged that the failure to provide services prevented non-Muslim inmates an opportunity to learn about Islam.In Bey v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 7:40 am
LEXIS 91074 (June 26, 2009)) and rejected an inmate's free exercise, equal protection and due process challenges to the Florida Department of Corrections discontinuance of its Jewish Dietary Accommodation Program.In Bey v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 7:00 am by Howard Friedman
Among other things, the opinion held that claims under RLUIPA for monetary damages are not available in personal capacity suits against officials and are barred by the 11th Amendment in official capacity suits.In Sherman-Bey v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 9:43 am by Howard Friedman
He alleged that the policy violated his free exercise and RLUIPA rights and that its implementation was discriminatory against African Americans.In Sumpter-Bey v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 11:30 pm by Martin Steiger
Die Beweislast liegt bei der betroffenen Person. [read post]