Search for: "U.S. v. Certain Funds in Uk"
Results 61 - 80
of 99
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2015, 6:21 pm
Supreme Court in its 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm
First, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2015) Professor James Stewart, of the Faculty of Law at the University of British Columbia, has produced a valuable on line symposium: Business and Human Rights: Next Steps. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:14 am
As discussed here, in Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi, v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:31 pm
Statements must be sent to the fund or, in certain cases, investors in the fund, within 120 days after the fund’s fiscal year end. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:04 am
Supreme Court’s holding in Morrison v, National Australia Bank – which held that the U.S. securities laws do not apply to securities transactions that take place outside the U.S. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 12:31 pm
Nevertheless, DoDNews writes that Congress is likely to pass the White House’s requests for $5.6 billion in funding for the fight against the Islamic State. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:14 am
Supreme Court’s 1974 decision in American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
The U.S. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 3:59 am
The Supreme Court a few weeks ago agreed to review the Second Circuit’s decision in ABC v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:40 pm
Copyright Office or published in the UK, Canada, or Australia; it granted the rightsholder the ability to renegotiate the revenue share and provided Google with added flexibility in discounting; and it created a fiduciary to hold payments due to orphan works: if the rightsholder was never ascertained, the funds would be distributed cy-près instead of redistributed among rightsholders. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 9:07 am
Certain countries, including the UK, Sweden and Germany (for existing funds as of July 22, 2013), are allowing a one-year transitional period delaying the application of the AIMFD to non-EU managers. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 12:00 am
[v] The U.N. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 1:20 am
IT websites are typically advertising-funded. [read post]
10 May 2013, 5:06 am
With the amendments, the final UK regulations implementing AIFMD would permit “existing” U.S. [read post]
10 May 2013, 5:06 am
With the amendments, the final UK regulations implementing AIFMD would permit “existing” U.S. [read post]
9 May 2013, 2:54 pm
Such processes are underway in other jurisdictions as well (for example, in the UK). [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 10:39 pm
Image from hereThe weekly review starts with a post by Gopika on the UK Supreme Court decision in Public Relations Consultants Association Limited v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 1:52 am
Supreme Court decision in Morrison v. [read post]
