Search for: "U.S. v. Christopher Lee" Results 61 - 80 of 170
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2015, 12:03 am by INFORRM
Singapore A Singapore blogger has been ordered to pay Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong S$29,000 (over £14,300) in costs after Lee won a defamation case against him. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm
(UCLA)Camp Mary Elizabeth (Indiana University)Carmel Jonathan (University of Michigan)Carroll Christopher (Johns Hopkins University)Cassar Gavin (University of Pennsylvania)Chaney Thomas (University of Chicago)Chari Varadarajan V. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:42 pm by fjhinojosa
Beyer was recently mentioned in Hunter, Jr. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:14 pm by cdw
” Ronnie Lee Gardner v. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 9:31 pm by RegBlog
Fighting Regulatory Capture in the 21st Century Mike Lee, U.S. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 9:05 pm by Jamison Chung
” In a working paper, Christopher H. [read post]
10 May 2023, 12:35 pm by Sean Harrington
  Indigenous Law  A Promise Kept: The Muscogee (Creek) Nation and Mcgirt V. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
” In The Economist, Steven Mazie looks at the recent oral argument in Lee v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 7:36 am by Justin Chan
(Image: Christopher Lee for the Innocence Project) Why the Sense of Urgency and Alarm? [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 2:02 pm by Jared Beck
During a time of perhaps unprecedented partisanship in U.S. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 5:55 am by Barbara Bavis
  Further, the United States Supreme Court recently heard arguments in Vance v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 12:40 pm by Jordan Brunner, Chris Mirasola
Looking to Coleman v Tennessee and Lee v Madigan, Wilkinson further argued that statutes should be read against granting military jurisdiction in criminal cases, particularly capital cases, and that no such intention should be ascribed to Congress without clear and direct language to that effect. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 1:34 am
Currently, SH Lee has been indicted for infringement of IP only (criminal case)The initial article in the Los Angeles Times did mention the presence of both patent and copyright issues in the matter involving Cha, Lee, and Kim. [read post]