Search for: "U.S. v. Cortes" Results 81 - 100 of 110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2005, 6:44 pm
El derecho constitucional de los Estados Unidos y su selectiva recepción en la jurisprudencia de la Corte Suprema Argentina", publicado en el suplemento especial de "Jurisprudencia Argentina" por los 140 años de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación (J.A. 2003-IV, ps. 1158 a 1166 - fascículo n. 9, 26 de noviembre de 2003).El artículo de Miller es The Authority of a Foreign Talisman: A Study of… [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 2:36 am by Cristina Mariottini
Mariottini, Senior Research Fellow at the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for Procedural Law: Henry Deeb GABRIEL, Contracts for the Sale of Goods – A Comparison of U.S. and International Law, 3rd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2022, pp. v-401. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 4:00 am by Lyonette Louis-Jacques
Each volume covers a particular topic: v.1 (International Law and the Law of the European Communities; v.2 (Freedom of Speech); v.3 (Questions of Law Arising from German Unification); v.4 (The Law of Freedom of Faith and the Law of Freedom of the Churches); v.5 (Family-Related Decisions). [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 4:02 am
Uncorroborated testimony sufficient to get to jury trialGreenberg Traurig LLPA new decision from the U.S. [read post]
26 Dec 2020, 5:30 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Esto ocurre, por ejemplo, si el hogar es destruido, afectado por un corte prolongado en los servicios esenciales, o ha quedado inaccesible, entre otras. [read post]
20 May 2013, 4:23 am by Jon Gelman
MAY 13, 2013  Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh The undersigned parties are committed to the goal of a safe and sustainable Bangladeshi ReadyMade Garment ("RMG") industry in which no worker needs to fear fires, building collapses, or  other accidents that could be prevented with reasonable health and safety measures. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 3:00 am by Redacción Mi Patente
Se desprende entonces, de la decisión de la Suprema Corte, que la cuestión de si un invento abarca materia viva o no, es irrelevante al hablar de patentes. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
A second follow-up case, Steinmetz et al v Germany, was filed in 2022. [read post]