Search for: "U.S. v. Garcet*"
Results 61 - 80
of 161
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2008, 12:10 pm
Public employees and the First Amendment right to free speechThomas v City of Blanchard, USCA 10th Circuit, No. 07-6197In considering a public employee's claim that his or her First Amendment right to free speech has been compromised by his or her public employer, courts distinguish between the employee's speech in terms of the vindication of a personal interest and the vindication of a public interest.Another arena in which an employee may contend that his or her employer's… [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 6:28 am
This time, the issue involves the speech rights of public employees.The case is Kennedy v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 2:17 am
Citing its decision in Casey v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 7:42 pm
U.S. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:34 am
In Andrew v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 9:47 am
Pursuant to the U.S. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 5:02 am
Law librarian was properly fired for "disruptive" e-mailKaye v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 8:00 am
Gyzenis, 2011 U.S. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 5:45 am
Citing Garcetti v Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410, the Circuit Court explained that "[W]hen public employees make statements pursuant to their official duties, the employees are not speaking as citizens for First Amendment purposes, and the Constitution does not insulate their communications from employer discipline. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 5:47 am
Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410, 421 (2006). [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 8:35 am
City of Mount Vernon, 2012 U.S. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 7:11 am
After the U.S. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 3:24 am
Ruotolo v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:46 am
*The U.S. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 6:11 am
At the same time, the U.S. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 1:14 am
U.S. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 12:05 pm
Posted by David Urban The U.S. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 2:36 pm
Also, at some point, U.S. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 5:43 am
Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410, 418 (2006). [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 8:56 am
EPA, U.S. [read post]
