Search for: "U.S. v. Gilmore" Results 21 - 40 of 82
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2016, 3:46 pm by Karen Gullo
” For the brief:https://www.eff.org/document/opening-brief-appellant-kidane-v-ethiopia For more on Kidane v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 5:45 am
Gilmore, concerning the application of the Vienna Convention on the Consular Relations, and United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 12:06 am
Gilmore, 372 U.S. 39, 49, 83 S.Ct. 623, 629 (1963) (“the characterization, as ‘business’ or ‘personal,’ of litigation costs … depends on whether or not the claim arises in connection with the taxpayer’s profit-seeking activities”). [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 5:53 am by Russell Knight
Gilmore, 372 U.S. 53, 1963 The lawyer’s fees will not be deductible If the spouse’s “claims stemmed entirely from the marital relationship, and not, under any tenable view of things, from income-producing activity” United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 9:00 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
Gilmore, 372 U.S. 39 (1963), divorce litigation is not a profit-seeking activity, so expenses incurred in connection with divorce litigation are normally not deductible. [read post]
22 May 2019, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
Gilmore] Tags: Alabama, art and artists, constitutional law, folk law, Maryland, photography, sexual orientation, transgender [read post]