Search for: "U.S. v. Griggs"
Results 41 - 60
of 87
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2019, 3:52 am
Kleber urges a different conclusion in no small part on the basis of the Supreme Court’s 1971 decision in Griggs v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 6:34 am
Citing the seminal case of Griggs v Duke Power Company, 401 U.S. 424 (1971), Kuczynski advised that the courts and the EEOC have applied Griggs consistently, and Congress confirmed it when it amended Title VII in the Civil Rights Act of 1991. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
Grigg
• Mejia v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 1:39 am
U.S. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:29 pm
Griggs County Social Services, 499 N.W.2d 876 (N.D. 1993); Department of Income Maintenance v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:31 am
Nevertheless, the Court, citing Griggs v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 5:03 pm
Griggs v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 5:03 pm
Griggs v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 5:33 pm
" Griggs v. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 12:01 am
Holmes County Board of Education which mandated segregated school systems to desegregate “at once,” Griggs v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:20 pm
Griggs v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 1:10 pm
Id. at 1328 (quoting Griggs, 459 U.S. at 58). [read post]
25 May 2017, 1:54 pm
In his famous dissent from Abrams v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:01 am
McClung (379 U.S. 294, 1964) upholding the right of the federal government to mandate desegregation in restaurants; and Griggs v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 12:36 pm
The basic law on tests and other job qualifications that have a disparate impact based on protected characteristics such as race and gender was pronounced by the Supreme Court in 1971 in Griggs v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 1:11 pm
555 U.S. at 571 (emphasis added). [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
Kleber also cannot be easily reconciled with aspects of the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Griggs v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 7:02 am
Supreme Court decision on disparate impact discrimination in employment is Griggs v. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
In caselaw, lawyers and historians can rely on new historical evidence to challenge previous rulings, as the Organization for Americans Historians did in Obergefell v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 12:09 pm
Supreme Court first recognized disparate impact discrimination in Griggs v. [read post]
