Search for: "U.S. v. Hernandez" Results 101 - 120 of 758
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2023, 1:07 pm by Joel R. Brandes
 [Mexico][Motion for Stay pending appeal] motion denied]      In Hernandez v Erazo, 2023 WL 2766803) (W.D. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 1:19 pm by CJLF Staff
Supreme Court decision regarding GPS tracking in United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 6:44 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals reinstates the false arrest claim.The case is Hernandez v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 7:21 am by Jack Goldsmith
Philipp; the Court’s disallowance of a damages suit against a U.S. official for a cross-border shooting in Hernandez v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 7:21 am by Jack Goldsmith
Philipp; the Court’s disallowance of a damages suit against a U.S. official for a cross-border shooting in Hernandez v. [read post]
30 May 2019, 8:11 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the May 23 conference)   Holguin-Hernandez v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 6:32 am by Howard Bashman
And Justice Sonia Sotomayor issued a dissent from the denial of certiorari in Hernandez v. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 4:40 pm by Steve Kalar
” Id. at *1.Held: “We hold that because Hernandez’s statement was ‘testimonial,’ see Crawford v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 8:04 am
The Court also issued a per curiam decision in Hernandez v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 12:24 pm
Mark D., 7 N.Y.3d 320, 853 N.E.2d 610, 820 N.Y.S.2d 199 (July 6, 2006), which was issued the same day as the court's same-sex marriage ruling, Hernandez v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 10:38 am by Jack Goldsmith
These materials cover, among other things, sanctions imposed by the Trump administration against officials of the International Criminal Court; efforts by Congress to regulate presidential withdrawal from certain treaties; lawsuits brought against China relating to the spread of COVID-19; recent lower court decisions concerning “sanctuary jurisdictions”; the Trump administration’s targeted killing of an Iranian general, Qassem Soleimani; and the Supreme Court’s disallowance… [read post]