Search for: "U.S. v. Jones (james D.)" Results 101 - 120 of 151
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2020, 8:40 am by Randy E. Barnett
Sunstein, One Case at a Time: Judicial Minimalism on the Supreme Court (Harvard, 2001) Larry D. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:01 am by Randy E. Barnett
City of New London and the Limits of Eminent Domain (2015) 2015: Damon Root, Over Ruled: The Long War for the Control of the U.S. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-6054, Jones v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Bruen, 597 U.S. 1, 36–37 (2022) (Thomas, J., for the majority of the Court); Bostock v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 5:01 am by Albert W. Alschuler
In 1934, the Senate found that he’d enabled a client to destroy documents it had subpoenaed and held him in contempt. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
  The judgment in the case of Smith v Jones [2020] NSWDC 262 was given on 28 May 2020. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
Jones, et alCourt: U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-30709 : August 26, 2011 Judge: Colloton Areas of Law: Constitutional Law, Government & Administrative Law, Labor & Employment Law, Legal Ethics, Professional Malpractice & Ethics Plaintiff was a secretary of G. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
Jones, et alCourt: U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-30709 : August 26, 2011 Judge: Colloton Areas of Law: Constitutional Law, Government & Administrative Law, Labor & Employment Law, Legal Ethics, Professional Malpractice & Ethics Plaintiff was a secretary of G. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
Colan Associates of Florida, LLC and The Jones Payne Group, Inc., of Mass., have agreed to pay $25,000 for alleged violations of the federal Clean Air Act and National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Asbestos. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm by Adam Thierer
As I’ve mentioned here previously, PFF has been rolling out a new series of essays examining proposals that would have the government play a greater role in sustaining struggling media enterprises, “saving journalism,” or promoting more “public interest” content. [read post]