Search for: "U.S. v. Lind" Results 1 - 20 of 103
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 9:46 am by Dennis Crouch
Linde Air Products Co., 339 U.S. 605 (1950), explaining that it operates to prevent copying that makes only minor, insubstantial changes to avoid the literal scope of the claims. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 10:46 am by Dennis Crouch
Linde Air Products Co., 339 U.S. 605 (1950) is one of the court’s most cited patent cases. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 8:27 pm by Dennis Crouch
Linde Air Products Co., 339 U.S. 605 (1950). [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 2:06 am by Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff
See, e.g., Festo Corp. v Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., 535 U.S. 722 (2002) (citing Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:39 pm by Dennis Crouch
Linde Air Products Co., 339 U.S. 605, 608 (1950). [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
What gives this approach such salience now, however, is the recent holding by the U.S Supreme Court in Rucho v. [read post]