Search for: "U.S. v. Melendez"
Results 41 - 60
of 217
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2012, 7:59 am
Furthermore, as the Court held in Bullcoming and in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 2:40 pm
In Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 8:42 am
Massachusetts, 557 U.S. 305 (2009)(no chemist), Briscoe v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 1:02 pm
Lerbs, 2004-SOX-8 at 13 (ALJ June 15, 2004)(relying on Melendez v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 7:39 am
State v. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 10:30 pm
” Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 4:00 pm
Read about Melendez-Diaz and a similar ruling, Bullcoming v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 1:10 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:55 pm
(2) How does the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:01 am
U.S. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 3:47 am
Melendez, 2012 U.S. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 4:37 am
Melendez, 2012 U.S. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 11:56 am
Seems like this case is watering down the U.S. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:12 am
Melendez v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 7:47 am
When this happen, the United States Supreme Court had to step in, and thus we have the case of Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 9:21 pm
Washington, (prosecution may not introduce testimonial hearsay against the defendant), Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 8:21 am
In recent years, the application of the right to confrontation in the context of laboratory or DNA test evidence has been the subject of much litigation at the United States Supreme Court In Melendez-Diaz v Massachusetts (129 S.Ct. 2527 [2009]), the Supreme Court held that it violate the right of confrontation for a prosecutor to submit a chemical drug test report without the testimony of a person who performed the test subject to confrontation. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 12:41 pm
In Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm
New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 572 (1942) and Diehl v. [read post]
