Search for: "U.S. v. Nawaz"
Results 1 - 19
of 19
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm
Pakistan A sessions court in Lahore issued notice to Prime Minister Imran Khan on the Rs10 billion suit for damages filed by Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) President Shehbaz Sharif. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 4:16 pm
United States U.S. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 4:01 pm
” U.S. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:29 pm
A spokeswoman for the U.S. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 12:17 pm
And with Washington set to greet Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif this week, Voice of America predicts talks between Sharif and Obama are not likely to get very far. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 11:06 am
In Ottawa yesterday, a gunman “shot and killed a soldier,” Cpl. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 12:40 pm
Seeking to support efforts in unstable North Waziristan, Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif made a rare visit to a military camp in the area. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 10:42 am
Carol Rosenberg of the Miami Herald publicizes the recent reveal in Obama v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 12:03 pm
However, in a presentation preceding Putin’s, Russia’s economic minister, Aleksei V. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 11:12 am
In an opinion in the Post, former U.S. [read post]
4 May 2014, 9:00 pm
Event Announcements (More details on the Events Calendar) Mon, May 5 at 9:30 am: Oral arguments in Ralls Corporation v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 9:00 am
Rozina Ali, senior editor at the Cairo Review of Global Affairs, has an op-ed in Al Jazeera America about the recent Hassan v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:56 am
Pakistan’s new president Nawaz Sharif called for the end of U.S. drone strikes within his country’s borders, reported Declan Walsh and Salmon Masood in the Times. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 10:41 pm
ZAFAR NAWAZ, Appellant, v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 12:26 pm
" US v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 12:26 pm
" US v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 12:26 pm
" US v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 12:26 pm
" US v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
The Constitution does not say anything about vesting of judicial power, unlike the U.S Constitution[6]. [read post]