Search for: "U.S. v. Poole*"
Results 61 - 80
of 129
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2022, 12:30 pm
Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410. noted that “when public employees make statements pursuant to their official duties ... the Constitution does not insulate their communications from employer discipline. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 6:41 am
Steinberg, 419 U.S. 379 (1975), a principle of which I was unaware until now. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:49 pm
The stars seem to have aligned such that our state appellate courts as well the U.S. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 12:20 pm
The Administration has placed high priority on mitigating and combating the theft of trade secrets, as exemplified in the Administration’s Joint Strategic Plan on Intellectual Property Enforcement, the Administration’s Strategy on Mitigating the Theft of U.S. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 9:22 am
Adams, 532 U.S. 105, 119 (2001). [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 7:01 pm
James highlighted the case of DuPont v Kolon - which concerned the Kevlar trade secrets (read about the case here in the testimony from Karen Cochran) - and recent cases concerning Chinese espionage (US v Xu and Zi, US v Xi and US v Chen) as examples of criminal trade secrets prosecution. [read post]
24 Dec 2006, 9:26 am
Federal Communications Commission," broadcast live from New York's U.S. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:30 am
The Court ruled that the criminal conviction violated the U.S. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 6:38 am
Complicating things is that plaintiff and defendant challenged the district court's ruling, so the Court of Appeals had to ask the U.S. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 6:47 am
This long-running case has already been the U.S. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:22 am
The Court of Appeals reverses because the district court had no jurisdiction over the state law claim.The case is Carver v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 2:45 pm
U.S., in which the Court rejected the “relationship test” as set forth in Newman, and reaffirmed the standard set in Dirks v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 2:45 pm
U.S., in which the Court rejected the “relationship test” as set forth in Newman, and reaffirmed the standard set in Dirks v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 10:01 am
In the 7-4 decision, the Court of Appeals cites executive authority and national security concerns in declining to extend Bivens liability in this context.The case is Arar v. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 7:48 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
On November 14, 2014, in Priests for Life v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 5:04 am
Supreme Court case construing the act, Sosa v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 8:35 am
The U.S. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 6:47 am
Pacifica Foundation, 438 U.S. 726 (1978) is outdated.The case is Fox Television v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 6:46 am
Bell, 426 U.S. 512 (1982), that "employment discrimination comes within the prohibition of Title IX. [read post]
