Search for: "U.S. v. Ramadan"
Results 61 - 80
of 300
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2013, 10:52 am
In White v. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 1:00 pm
In Ackerman v. [read post]
17 Jan 2016, 6:00 am
Smith, 2016 U.S. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 1:45 pm
In Timbuktu v. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 6:37 am
LEXIS 105329 (MD TN, Aug. 11, 2015), a Tennessee federal district court dismissed a Muslim inmate's complaint that on one occasion during Ramadan he was not served dinner.In Sousa v. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 9:38 am
Lewis, II and Salem Alshdaifat, known as U.S. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 6:30 am
LEXIS 168188 (SD NY, Dec. 16, 2015), a New York federal district court allowed a Muslim inmate to move ahead with his complaint under the free exercise clause that the nutritional inadequacy of the Ramadan meals, combined with the inability to supplement the meals with food from the commissary, forced him to switch from the Ramadan diet.In Johnson v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 8:00 am
In Epps v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 7:13 am
In Hatton v. [read post]
29 May 2016, 2:42 pm
In Clark v. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 8:35 pm
In Hill v. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 9:59 am
In Mayo v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
In Michalski v. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 11:36 am
In Timmons v. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 7:00 am
LEXIS 180003, Nov. 4, 2013) and dismissed a Muslim inmate's complaint that his rights were violated when he was not given special Ramadan meals in 2011 because he failed to comply with the sign-up procedure to participate.In Rupe v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
In Koger v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 6:35 pm
In Wright v. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 10:59 am
LEXIS 21191 (SD CA, Feb. 7, 2018), a California federal district court allowed an inmate to move ahead with his complaint that he was not allowed to participate in Ramadan in 2017.In Icangelo v. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 11:25 am
In Davis v. [read post]
21 May 2017, 8:54 am
LEXIS 74369 (D AZ, May 15, 2017), an Arizona federal district court dismissed an inmate's complaint that he was not permitted to participate in the Ramadan fast when staff should have known he wished to participate.In Al-Bukhari v. [read post]
